Commissive crimes by omission -Impure or promiscuous omissive crimes: practical consequences to the guarantor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00018.19Keywords:
Improper omissive crimes, Guarantor, Criminal Responsibility, Protection, Omission, Duty of care, Rape of a vulnerable personAbstract
The objective of this article is to present the result of a study that sought to understand the circumstances of the crime of omission, in the context of a guarantor, and to assess the way in which improper omission crimes occur, as well as to evaluate how the criminal liability of the person who has the duty of care, protection or surveillance, that is, the guarantor, in the face of its omission. The results indicated that, although there is a perception on the part of the guarantor that the guarantor is appearing as a victim, other factors stand out in that threat, such as financial and emotional dependence and even the fear of breaking the relationship, divorce when marital. Although involuntarily, a choice is made, which is configured as malice in the crime and, therefore, as a co-participant in accordance to national judgments.
Downloads
References
BAIER, Helmut. Unterlassungsstrafbarkeit trotz fehlender Handlungsoder Schuldfahigkeit. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Rechtsfigur der omissio libera in causa, in Goldhammers Archiv, 1999.
BIERRENBACH, Shheila. Crimes omissivos impróprios. Belo Horizonte: DelRey, 1996.
BITENCOURT, Cezar. Tratado de direito penal, vol. 1, 15 São Paulo: Saraiva, 2010.
BRASIL, Decreto-Lei Nº 3.914, de 9 de dezembro de 1941. Lei de introdução do Código Penal (decreto-lei n. 2.848, de 7-12-940) e da Lei das Contravenções Penais (decreto-lei n. 3.688, de 3 outubro de 1941).
BRASIL. Decreto-Lei Nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Lei que estabelece os tipos penais, tanto de ação como omissão, estipulando suas respectivas penas (mínimo e máximo). Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decretolei/del2848.htm. Acesso em: 26 de ago. 2019.
FRAGOSO. Heleno Cláudio. Crimes omissivos no direito brasileiro. Revista de Direito Penal e Criminologia, v. 33. Acesso em: 26 ago.2019.
HUNGRIA, Nelson. Comentários ao código penal, Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1958.
JESCHECK, Hans-Heinrich. Falle und Losung zum Lehrbuch des Strafrecht, AT, Berlin: Dunker & Humblot, 1978.
JESUS, Damásio de, Direito penal, volume 1: parte geral / Damasio de Jesus. - 35º ed. - São Paulo: Saraiva, 2014. 1. Direito penal 2. Direito penal – Brasil I. Título.
LINTON, Ralph. Rollen und Status, 1945, in Heinz Hartmann (org.), Moderne amerikanische Soziologie, Stuttgart: Enke, 1973.
KAUFMANN, Armin. Die Dogmatik der Unterlassungsdelikte, Gottingen: O. Schwartz, 1959.
KOSTLIN, Christian Reinhold. Neue Revision der Grundbegriffe des Kriminalrechts, Tubingen, 1845, reimpressão, Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1970.
NUCCI, Guilherme de Souza, Curso de Direito Penal: parte geral: arts. 1º a 120 do Código Penal – 3. ed. – Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2019. Direito penal – Brasil.
NUCCI, Guilherme de Souza. Manual de Direito Penal – 15. ed. – Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2019. Brasil.
NUCCI, Guilherme de Souza. Manual de direito penal / Guilherme de Souza Nucci. – 14. ed. rev., atual. e ampl. – Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2018.
QUEIROZ, Paulo, Curso de Direito Penal parte Geral .11ºed. revista, ampliada e atualizada. São Paulo: Editora JusPODIVM, 2015.
ROXIN, Claus. Fundamentos político-criminales del derecho penal, Buenos Aires: Hammurabi, 2008.
SCHUNEMAN, Bernd. Del descubrimiento de Welzel del domínio social del hecho al desarrollo del domínio sobre el fundamento del resultado como principio general de autoria, in Problemas capitales del moderno derecho penal, México, 2005.
SCHUNEMANN, Bernd. Grund und Grenzen der unechten Unterlassungsdelikte, , Gottingen: Schwartz, 1971.
SCHONKE/SCHRODER/STREE. Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar, 2006.
TAVARES, Juarez Estevam Xavier. Teoria dos crimes omissivos, UERJ, 2011.
WELZEL, Hans. Estudios de derecho penal. Buenos Aires: BdeF, 2003.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anderson Filipini Ribeiro, Jonas Rodrigo Gonçalves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For universalization and free sharing of knowledge, CONSINTER Journal is indexed under the Creative Commons 4.0 License
Attribution – Non-Commercial Use – Sharing by the same 4.0 Brazil license.
It’s allowed:
– Copy, distribute, display and execute the work
– Create derivative works
Under the following conditions:
ATTRIBUTION
You must give credit to the original author, as specified by the author or licensor.
NON-COMMERCIAL USE
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
SHARING BY THE SAME LICENSE
If you change, transform, or create another work based on it, you may only distribute the resulting work under a license identical to this one.
For each new use or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms for this work.
Legal License (full license): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR
