Pacto Antenupcial: Disposições Sobre Alimentos e Estipulação de Penas Patrimoniais em Caso de Divórcio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00015.25Palavras-chave:
family law, marriage, private autonomy, prenuptial agreementResumo
The present study aims to analyze the content limits of the prenuptial agreement, notably by approaching the existing dichotomy between private autonomy versus state interference in Family Law. Under this approach, it is intended to verify whether the aforementioned pact could include (i) a provision that deals with alimony; and (ii) inclusion of property penalties due by one spouse to the other in case of rupture of the marital relationship. There are few scientific works that address the specificities and controversies of the institute in the Brazilian legal system. In addition, research shows that the number of prenuptial agreements signed in the country has practically doubled in the last ten years, which reinforces the relevance of this study. The method used is deductive, through bibliographic research, including using comparative law, notably Portuguese law.
Downloads
Referências
GERMANY. Civil Code. 1896. Available at: <http://www.fd.ulisboa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Codigo-Civil-Alemao-BGB-German-Civil-Code-BGB-english-version.pdf>. Accessed on 15 Aug. 2018.
BERDEJO; Jose Luis Lacruz; REBULLIDA, Francisco de Asis Sancho. Elements of civil derecho, Derecho de Familia, Barcelona, Bosch, 1982. v. IV.
BRAZIL, Law n. 10,406, January 10, 2002. Establishes the Civil Code. Official Federal Gazette, Brasília, DF, 11 jan. 2002. Available at: < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/2002/L1040 6compilada.htm >Accessed on: July 7, 2022.
______. Superior Justice Tribunal. Special Appeal n. 1726229 – RJ, of the Third Class, Brasília, DF, May 15, 2018. Lex: jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the State of Rio de Janeiro, 2017. Available at: <http://www.portaljustica.com .br/acordao/2116164>. Accessed on 15 Aug. 2018.
______. Superior Justice Tribunal. Newsletter n. 563, of the Quarta Turma, Brasília, DF, from May 29 to June 14, 2015. Lex: jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, 2011. Available at: <http://www.stj.jus. br/SCON/SearchBRS?b=INFJ&tipo=informativo&livre=@COD=%270563%27>. Accessed on 15 Aug. 2018.
______. Superior Justice Tribunal. Newsletter n. 562, of the Third Class of Brasília, DF, from May 18 to 28, 2015. Lex: jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, 2014. Available at: <http://www.stj.jus.br/ SCON/SearchBRS?b=INFJ&type=informative&free=@COD=%270562%27>. Accessed on 15 Aug. 2018.
CAHALI, Francisco José, Cohabitation agreement in a stable union, São Paulo, Saraiva, 2002.
CARDOSO, Fabiana Domingues, Property regime and prenuptial agreement, São Paulo, Method, 2011.
CENSEC. Notarial Center for Shared Services. Available at: . Accessed on 06 Feb. 2018.
COELHO, Francisco Manuel Pereira. Family Law Course. Coimbra, 1986.
COLOMER, André. Droit Civil, Regimes matromoniaux. Paris, Libr. Techniques, 1982.
COLTRO, Antônio Carlos Mathias. References on the common-law marriage contract. In: DELGADO, Mário Luiz; ALVES, Jones Figueiredo (Orgs.). New Civil Code: controversial issues, São Paulo, Method, 2005. v. 4.
COLTRO, Antônio Carlos; TEIXEIRA, Sálvio de Figueiredo; MAFRA, Teresa Cristina Monteiro. Comments on the new civil code, Rio de Janeiro, Forensics, 2005.
______. Droit Civil, Matrimonial Regimes. 7. Ed. Paris, Litec, 1995.
DINIZ, Maria Helena. Brazilian civil law course. 29. ed., São Paulo, Saraiva, 2014. v. 5.
SPAIN. Civil Code. 1889. Available at: <http://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/1889/BOE-A-1889-4763-consolidado.pdf>. Accessed on 06 Feb. 2018.
FRANCE. Civil Code. 1804. Available at: <https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721>. Accessed on 06 Feb. 2018.
GANGI, Calogero. Il matrimonio. Milano, Giuffrè, 1969.
GERNHUBER, Joachim; KOESTER-WALTJEN. Lehrbuch des Familienrechts, Munich, CH Beck, 1994.
GOMES, Orlando. Family right. 3. ed., Rio de Janeiro, Forensics, 1978.
GONÇALVES, Luiz da Cunha. Principles of Portuguese-Brazilian civil law, São Paulo, Max Limonad, 1951. v. 3.
GOZZO, Débora, Prenuptial Pact, São Paulo, Saraiva, 1992.
BRAZILIAN INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS (IBGE). Antenuptial Agreement Writing. Available at: . Accessed on 06 Feb. 2018.
______. Civil Registry Statistics. Available at: . Accessed on 06 Feb. 2018.
______. Research Directorate, Population and Social Indicators Coordination, Civil Registry Statistics. Available at: . Accessed on 06 Feb. 2018.
ITALY, Civil Code. 1942. Available at: <http://www.jus.unitn.it/cardozo/obiter_dictum/codciv/Codciv.htm>. Accessed on 06 Feb. 2018.
LEHMANN, Heinrich. Family right. Translation by Jose Maria. ships. Private Derecho Magazine. Madrid, 1953.
LEITE, Gisele. The importance of the prenuptial agreement, IOB Journal of Family Law, São Paulo, IOB, year IX, n. 45, Dec.-Jan, 2008.
LÔBO, Paulo Luiz Netto, Civil Code commented, São Paulo, Atlas, 2004. v. XVI.
MADALENO, Rolf, Family law. 7. ed. rev., current. and amp., Rio de Janeiro, Forensics, 2017.
MAFRA, Tereza Cristina Monteiro. Contractualization of marriage and simplification of forms: issues relating to marital status and reconciliation. Brazilian Journal of Family Law. Porto Alegre. Synthesis, IBDFAM, n. 41, Apr-May, 2007. v. 9.
MALAURIE, Philippe, AYNÈS, Laurent. Droit Civil, Les régimes matrimoniaux. Paris, Cujas, 1994.
MARQUES, Roberto Lins. Prenuptial Agreement: Formal Aspects – Mutability. Property regime: family law and inheritance. In: VALADÃO, Luiz Fernando (Coord.), Belo Horizonte, Del Rey, 2014.
MILAGRES, Marcelo de Oliveira. Cogent norms and provisions of family law. Private Law Magazine. In: NERY JUNIOR, Nelson; NERY, Rosa Maria de Andrade (Coords.). Year 9, n. 35, Jul-Sep, 2008. v. 35.
MONTEIRO, Washington de Barros. Civil law course – family law. 33. ed., São Paulo, Saraiva, 1996.
NEVARES, Ana Luiza Maia. The mandatory separation of property regime and the entry 377 of the Federal Supreme Court. Civilistica.com. Rio de Janeiro, a. 3, n. 1, Jan.-Jun./2014. Available at: <http://civilistica.com/o-regime-de-separaco-obrigatoria-de-bens-eo-verbete-377-do-supremo-tribunal-federal/>. Access on 18 March. 2018.
PEREIRA, Lafayette Rodrigues. Family Rights. Annotations and Adaptations to the Civil Code by José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva. 4. ed., Rio de Janeiro, Freitas Bastos, 1945.
PEREIRA, Rodrigo da Cunha. Fundamental guiding principles of family law, Belo Horizonte, Del Rey, 2006.
PEREIRA, Caio Mário da Silva. Civil law institutions. 11. ed., Rio de Janeiro, Forensics, 2000. v. 5.
PERLINGIERI, Pietro. Civil law in constitutional legality. Translation by Maria Cristina de Cicco, Rio de Janeiro, Renovar, 2008.
______. Private law treaty. São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 1983. v. 8.
PORTUGAL. Civil Code. 1966. Available at: <http://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?nid=775&tabela=leis>. Access on 18 March. 2018.
RIZZARDO, Arnaldo. FamilyLaw: Law n. 10,406, of 01.10.2002, Rio de Janeiro, Forense, 2007.
ROSENVALD, Nelson; FARIAS, Cristiano Chaves de. Civil law course: families. 7. ed. rev. amp and current, São Paulo, Atlas, 2015. v. 6.
SANTOS, Francisco Cláudio de Almeida, The prenuptial pact and private autonomy. In: BASTOS, Eliene Ferreira; SOUZA, Asiel Henrique de (Coords.), Family and jurisdiction, Belo Horizonte, Del Rey, 2006.
STJ. SPECIAL APPEAL, REsp 995.538/AC, Rep. Justice NANCY ANDRIGHI, THIRD PANEL, judged on 03/04/2010, DJe 03/17/2010). Available at: <https://stj.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/583716180/recurso-especial-resp-1720337-pr-2018-0016836-3>. Accessed on: June 7, 2022.
TARTUCE, Flávio. Civil law: family law. In: TARTUCE, Flávio; SIMÃO, Jose Fernando. 4. ed. São Paulo, Method, 2010. v. 5.
TERRÉ, François; SIMLER, Philippe. Droit civil, Les matrimoniaux. 2nd ed. Paris, Dalloz, 1994.
TEPEDINO, Gustavo. Civil law topics. 3. ed. rev. and current, Rio de Janeiro, Renovar, 2004.
VELOSO, Zeno. Property matrimonial regime. In: PEREIRA, Rodrigo da Cunha (Coord.). Contemporary family law, Belo Horizonte, Del Rey, 1997.
XAVIER, Maria Rita, Limits to private autonomy in the discipline of property relations between spouses, Lisbon, Livraria Almedina – Coimbra, 2000.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Para fins da universalização e compartilhamento livre dos saberes a Revista do CONSINTER está indexada sob a Licença Creative Commons 4.0
Atribuição – Uso Não Comercial – Compartilhamento pela mesma licença 4.0 Brasil.
É permitido:
– Copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra
– Criar obras derivadas
Sob as seguintes condições:
ATRIBUIÇÃO
Você deve dar crédito ao autor original, da forma especificada pelo autor ou licenciante.
USO NÃO COMERCIAL
Você não pode utilizar esta obra com finalidades comerciais.
COMPARTILHAMENTO PELA MESMA LICENÇA
Se você alterar, transformar ou criar outra obra com base nesta, você somente poderá distribuir a obra resultante sob uma licença idêntica a esta.
Para cada novo uso ou distribuição, você deve deixar claro para outro, os termos da licença desta obra.
Licença Jurídica (licença integral): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR
