Special retirement from EC n. 103/2019 and the incompatibility of the new regulations in the constitutional pension protection program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00022.14Keywords:
Social Security, Special Retirement, Pension Reform, Constitutional Amendment No. 103/2019, Minimum AgeAbstract
In 1988, a welfare program was also elected based on social security legal agreements, inspired by social justice and the founding premise of human dignity. The ideals of protection and inclusion drive its foundations and reasons for existence, specifically with regard to the planned benefit package provided for in federal social security legislation. This article aims to investigate the contradictory effects of the new provisions of the special retirement benefit established by the new reform of the national social security system through Constitutional Amendment (CA) No. 103 of November 13, 2019. The problem that has arisen and needs to be understood lies in the establishment of new objective criteria that are incompatible with the system as a whole and which, unfortunately, will result in the lack of protection and weakening of the core activity of social security technology as a whole. To this end, analytical, deductive, and descriptive methods will be used, along with doctrinal and jurisprudential research. The aim is to demonstrate that the new constitutional regulations in this regard are incompatible with the founding guidelines of social protection that nourish the complex Brazilian social security system, notably for rights holders with proven exposure to risk agents.
Downloads
References
ARAUJO, Luiz Alberto; Nunes JR., Vidal Serrano, Curso de Direito Constitucional, São Paulo, Saraiva, 1998.
BALERA, Wagner, Sistema de Seguridade Social, 5ª ed., São Paulo, LTr, 2009.
_______________ Legislação Previdenciária Anotada; 1ª ed.; São Paulo; Conceito; 2011.
CANOTILHO, J. J. Gomes; Direito Constitucional e Teoria da Constituição; Almedina; 2000.
IBRAHIM, Fábio Zambitte, Desaposentação – O caminho para uma melhor aposentadoria, 2ª ed., Rio de Janeiro, Impetus, 2009.
HORVATH JUNIOR, Miguel. Direito Previdenciário. 8 ed. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2010.
________________________. Direito Previdenciário. 10. ed. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2014.
KERTZMAN, Ivan. Curso Prático de Direito Previdenciário. 5ª ed. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2008.
MARTINEZ, Wladimir Novaes, Curso de direito previdenciário, 4ª ed., São Paulo, LTr, 2012.
MARTINS, Sergio Pinto. Direito da Seguridade Social. 25. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
RIBEIRO, Maria Helena Carreira Alvim. Aposentadoria especial: regime geral da previdência social. 3ª ed., Paraná: Juruá,2009.
SALIBA, Tuffi Messias. Aposentadoria Especial. 2. ed. São Paulo: LTR, 2013.
SERAU Jr., Marco Aurelio, Desaposentação: novas perspectivas teóricas e práticas, 6ª ed., São Paulo, LTr, 2016.
TAVARES, Marcelo Leonardo; Previdência e Assistência Social – Legitimação e Fundamentação Constitucional; 4ª ed.; São Paulo; 2003.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sérgio Henrique Salvador, Régis Willyan da Silva Andrade
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For universalization and free sharing of knowledge, CONSINTER Journal is indexed under the Creative Commons 4.0 License
Attribution – Non-Commercial Use – Sharing by the same 4.0 Brazil license.
It’s allowed:
– Copy, distribute, display and execute the work
– Create derivative works
Under the following conditions:
ATTRIBUTION
You must give credit to the original author, as specified by the author or licensor.
NON-COMMERCIAL USE
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
SHARING BY THE SAME LICENSE
If you change, transform, or create another work based on it, you may only distribute the resulting work under a license identical to this one.
For each new use or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms for this work.
Legal License (full license): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR
