Determinant presuppositions of the law: humanity and positivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00021.01Keywords:
Presuppositions, Law, Positivation, Human NatureAbstract
Abstract: Positive Law does not constitute an isolated normative system disconnected from social reality; rather, it is grounded in fundamental assumptions that refer to human existence, nature, and interpersonal interactions. Law is thus conceived as an institutionalized response to the demands for safeguarding the subjective rights inherent to each society. Consequently, the current legal framework represents nothing more than the formalization of a consensus regarding what, from the standpoint of human intellectual nature, ought to be legally protected. This research has been conducted through a descriptive and analytical methodological approach. In the descriptive phase, an inquiry was made into how legal systems reflect inescapable presuppositions that precede the formulation of legal norms. In the analytical phase, the study explored how values are transformed into subjective rights, whose protection becomes the primary objective of the legal system. A comprehensive understanding of Positive Law is unattainable without considering the axiological and anthropological foundations that sustain it, as it constitutes a normative manifestation of society’s juridical aspirations. It can be asserted that Positive Law invariably owes its existence to Natural Law; in other words, all legal positivism is ultimately rooted in a form of natural law. Each society chooses to legislate and protect those rights it deems essential for the orderly and stable development of human nature within a social context. Positive Law cannot be dissociated from the rights inherent to human nature, for it is precisely to them that it owes its very existence.
Downloads
References
ALMOGUERA CARRERES, Joaquín, Lecciones de teoría del derecho, Madrid, Reus, 2009.
ATIENZA, Manuel, El sentido del derecho, Barcelona, Ariel, 2019.
CABRAL DE MONCADA, L., «Derecho positivo y ciencia del Derecho», en El hecho del Derecho, traducido por Lorenzo Carnelli, Buenos Aires, Losada, 1956, pp. 13-47.
CARNELUTTI, Francesco, Cómo nace el Derecho, traducido por Santiago Sentís y Marino Ayerra, Bogotá, Temis, 2018.
CARPINTERO, Francisco, Derecho y ontología jurídica, Madrid, Actas, 1993.
CERVANTES, Miguel de, Don Quijote de la Mancha, Madrid, Alfaguara, 2004.
CESARINI SFORZA, Widar, El Derecho de los particulares, traducido por José Calvo González, Madrid, Civitas, 2016.
CONTRERAS UGARTE, Jesús Víctor Alfredo, «Enfoque filosófico sobre la independencia judicial», en Pesos y contrapesos. Injerencias de la política en la justicia, coordinado por Jesús Villegas Fernández y L. Alfredo de Diego Díez, La Coruña, Colex, 2024, pp. 569-580.
CONTRERAS UGARTE, Jesús Víctor Alfredo, «La retórica eufemística en el discurso político-legal», en Cristianismo y Derecho, director Diego Medina Morales, Madrid, Dykinson 2024, pp. 241-259.
CONTRERAS UGARTE, Jesús Víctor Alfredo, Derecho derrengado y la esencialidad filosófica del Derecho, El Basilisco, Oviedo, nº 58, 2023, pp. 39-53, Disponible en: https://www.fgbueno.es/bas/bas58f.htm, Consultado el: 26 de mayo de 2025.
COTTA, Sergio, ¿Qué es el derecho?, traducido por J. J. Blasco, Madrid, Rialp, 2014.
FALCÓN Y TELLA, María, Concepto y fundamento de la validez del Derecho, Madrid, Civitas, 1994.
FERNÁNDEZ DE LA MORA, Gonzalo, Del Estado ideal al Estado de la razón, Madrid, SND, 2025.
FISS, Owen, El Derecho como razón pública, traducido por Esteban Restrepo Saldarriaga, Madrid, Marcial Pons.
GALLEGO, Elio, Norma, normativismo y Derecho. Del moderno normativismo jurídico a la metafísica de la ley, Madrid, Dykinson, 1999.
GARCÍA MÁYNES, Eduardo, La definición del Derecho, México D. F., Xalapa, 1960.
GENTILE, Francesco, El ordenamiento jurídico, entre la virtualidad y la realidad, Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2001.
HUBER, Eugen, El Derecho y su realización. Problemas de legislación y de filosofía del derecho, traducido por Hertha Grimm, vol. I, Madrid, Biblioteca del Instituto Ibero-Americano de Derecho Comparado,1927.
LARENZ, Karl, Derecho justo. Fundamentos de ética jurídica, traducido por J. L. Diez-Picazo, Madrid, Civitas, 1985.
LEGAZ Y LACAMBRA, Luis, El derecho y el amor, Barcelona, Bosch, 1976.
LLOYD, Dennis, La idea del Derecho. ¿Perversión represora o necesidad social?, traducido por Rosa Aguilar y Mercedes Barat, Madrid, Civitas, 1985.
NACIONES UNIDAS, Asamblea General, Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, París, 1948.
NIETO, Alejandro, Crítica de la razón jurídica, Madrid, Trotta, 2007.
RECASÉNS SICHES, Luis, Tratado general de filosofía del Derecho. México D. F., Porrúa, 2013.
ROBLES MORCHÓN, Gregorio, Ley y derecho vivo, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JESÚS VÍCTOR CONTRERAS UGARTE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For universalization and free sharing of knowledge, CONSINTER Journal is indexed under the Creative Commons 4.0 License
Attribution – Non-Commercial Use – Sharing by the same 4.0 Brazil license.
It’s allowed:
– Copy, distribute, display and execute the work
– Create derivative works
Under the following conditions:
ATTRIBUTION
You must give credit to the original author, as specified by the author or licensor.
NON-COMMERCIAL USE
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
SHARING BY THE SAME LICENSE
If you change, transform, or create another work based on it, you may only distribute the resulting work under a license identical to this one.
For each new use or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms for this work.
Legal License (full license): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR


