Domestic violence against women as a social risk to Brazilian social security
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00022.19Keywords:
Violence against women, Social risk, Social security system, Precedent, Multilevel constitutionalismAbstract
This text presents a proposal to recognize situations of domestic or family violence against women as one of the social risks to be protected by Brazilian Social Security regulations (hypothesis), in light of global and regional (inter-American) human rights systems, notably CEDAW and its respective Committee, as well as the Belém do Pará Convention, considering, for this purpose, the openness and permeability of human rights recognized in international documents, as provided for in CRFB/1988. In addition, it seeks to identify Recommendations and/or the duty to protect the socioeconomic rights of women victims of gender violence and their impact at the domestic level, such as the implementation of the guidelines of interdimensionality and progressivity of human rights (objectives). The CEDAW, its Committee, and the respective General Recommendations were consulted, in addition to the Belém do Pará Convention, seeking to identify, among the legal norms to combat gender violence, those of a socially protective nature. Based on this, we sought to analyze the vote reported by Minister Flávio Dino in the judgment of Extraordinary Appeal n. 1.520.468-PR, within the scope of the Federal Supreme Court, whose object overlaps with that of this research. The data collected was analyzed through critical narrative review, in that the author's conclusions (data collection and analysis methods) were added to the doctrinal arguments, legal norms, and precedent (established thesis and its determining grounds). It was found that domestic or family violence against women places them in or exacerbates a state of need and economic vulnerability, with socioeconomic repercussions (social determinants), including in the areas of health, social security, and social assistance, according to the current Brazilian constitutional model. From the external systems for eliminating discrimination against women, we can derive the state's duty to adopt public policies for the socioeconomic protection of women who are victims of gender-based violence. The decision of the Federal Supreme Court, in turn, consolidates the systems designed to protect women victims of gender-based violence (results). Thus, domestic or family violence against women constitutes one of the social risks protected by the Brazilian Social Security System (final considerations).
Downloads
References
Beauvoir, Simone de, O segundo sexo, Brasil: Nova Fronteira, 2014.
Bobbio, Norberto, A era dos direitos, tradução de Carlos Nelson Coutinho, Apresentação de Celso Lafer, Rio de Janeiro, LTC, 2020, p. 64.
Brasil, Assembleia Nacional Constituinte, Constituição Federal, de 05 de outubro de 1988, Disponível em, http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991 (Lei dos Planos de Benefícios da Previdência Social), Disponível em, https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8213cons.htm?hsCtaTracking=8dbf00ec-3047-42cb-bdec-5135b6af0ce5%7C75c3cf15-d229-48dd-ad4a-7c2ca608a1d7, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 10.778, de 24 de novembro de 2003, Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/2003/L10.778.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 11.340, de 7 de agosto de 2006 (Lei Maria da Penha), Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11340.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 12.015, de 7 de agosto de 2009, Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2009/lei/l12015.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 12.737, de 30 de novembro de 2012 (Lei Carolina Dieckmann), Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12737.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 12.845, de 1º de agosto de 2013, Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12845.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 13.104, de 9 de março de 2015 (Lei do Feminicídio), Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13104.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 13.718, de 24 de setembro de 2018, Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13718.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 13.894, de 29 de outubro de 2019, Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2019/lei/l13894.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 14.132, de 31 de março de 2021, Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2021/lei/l14132.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 14.245, de 22 de novembro de 2021 (Lei Mariana Ferrer), Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2021/lei/l14245.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 14.887, de 12 de junho de 2024, Disponível em https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14887.htm, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Brasil, Supremo Tribunal Federal, Recurso Extraordinário repetitivo n. 1.520.468-PR (Tema 1.370), Disponível em, https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=7064773, Acesso em, 31.08.2025.
Lamy, Marcelo, Metodologia da pesquisa: técnicas de investigação, argumentação e redação, 2ª ed., rev., atual. e ampl., São Paulo, Matrioska Editora, 2020.
Lamy, Marcelo, Oliveira, Danilo de, Sistema brasileiro de precedentes judiciais, 1. ed., São Paulo, EDSC, 2024.
Oliveira, Danilo de, Hermenêutica do desenvolvimento, São Paulo, Matrioska Editora, 2023.
Paiva, Caio; Heemann, Thimotie Aragon. Jurisprudência internacional de direitos humanos. 3ª ed. Belo Horizonte: CEI, 2020.
Pimentel, Silvia; Bianchini, Alice, Feminismo(s), São Paulo, Matrioska, 2021.
Pimentel, Silvia. Gênero e Direito. In: Campilongo, Celso Fernandes; Gonzaga, Álvaro de Azevedo; Freire, André Luiz (Coord.). Enciclopédia Jurídica da PUC-SP: Teoria Geral e Filosofia do Direito. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2017. Tomo 1. p. 2-36.
Soares, Ricardo Maurício Freire, Hermenêutica e Interpretação Jurídica, 3ª ed., rev., ampl. e atual, São Paulo, Saraiva, 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Danilo de Oliveira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For universalization and free sharing of knowledge, CONSINTER Journal is indexed under the Creative Commons 4.0 License
Attribution – Non-Commercial Use – Sharing by the same 4.0 Brazil license.
It’s allowed:
– Copy, distribute, display and execute the work
– Create derivative works
Under the following conditions:
ATTRIBUTION
You must give credit to the original author, as specified by the author or licensor.
NON-COMMERCIAL USE
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
SHARING BY THE SAME LICENSE
If you change, transform, or create another work based on it, you may only distribute the resulting work under a license identical to this one.
For each new use or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms for this work.
Legal License (full license): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR


