Antissemitismo Digital: o Paradigma Tecnológico nas Modulações de Discriminação dos Judeus

Pedro Lima Marcheri

doi:10.19135/revista.consinter.00012.01

Authors

Pedro Lima Marcheri Doutor em Direito pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino de Bauru – ITE. Mestre em Direito pelo Centro Universitário Eurípedes de Marília – UNIVEM. Professor na graduação em Direito Penal no Centro Universitário Católico Salesiano “Auxilium” – UniSALESIANO, Lins – São Paulo – Brasil. E-mail: pedrolimaadvogados@hotmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0301-2819

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00012.01

Keywords:

Anti-Semitism, Prejudice, Internet, Hate Speech, Computer Crimes

Abstract

Discrimination against Jews was densified from the uprising of new technologies. Before the emergence of new types of odious discrimination on the Internet, this work sought to highlight improvements in the legal model for the protection of Jews, promoting the inclusion of minorities in criminal law. The hypothesis consists in the inadequacy of criminal types that fight anti-Semitism due to inadequate linguistic records of crimes elementary. Starting from a deductive-hypothetical study on the influence of new technologies in this phenomenon, new languages of odious discrimination against Jews were observed in the world wide web, the so-called virtual anti-Semitism. This phenomenon is not satisfactorily addressed by law, notably in current criminalization patterns. In order to face this issue, it is necessary to insert specific legal measures for computer crimes. It was concluded that the gaps related to criminalization converge in three factors: lack of identification of different forms of anti-Semitism; strengthening Jewish identity; adoption of a criminalization model that limits the possible criminal frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARGENTINA, Daia v. Google. 2011, Injunción – 46 Juzgado Civil de la capital Buenos Aires, in: Internet en Argentina: Mapeo de la situación en materia de acesso, regulación, y derechos humanos, Centro de Estudios en Libertad Expresión y Acceso a la Información – CELE, Universidad de Palermo – Facultad de Derecho, Disponível em: <http://www.palermo.edu/cele/pdf/investigaciones/Mapping-ARG-CELE.pdf>. Acesso em: 25. mar. 2020.

BAR-ILAN, Judit, Web Links and Search Engine Ranking: The Case of Google and the Query “Jew”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, n. 57, v. 12, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20404

BRASIL, Medida Cautelar nº 0030603-92.2016.8.9.0001, Juiz Alberto Salomão Júnior, 02. fev. 2016, Conjur. Disponível em: <http://s.conjur.com.br/dl/livro-hitler-rj.pdf>. Acesso em: 08. ago. 2020.

CITRON, Danielle Keats, Hate Crimes in Cyberspace, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674735613

COMTE-SPONVILLE, André, Pequeno Tratado das Grandes Virtudes, São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 2009.

DELFINO, Lúcio; SILVEIRA, Marcelo Pichioli da; CASTRO E SILVA, Jhonatan de, Proibição a livro de Adolf Hitler ignora solenemente dispositivos constitucionais, 05, fev, 2016, Consultor Jurídico, Disponível em: <http://www.conjur.com.br/2016-fev-05/proibir-livro-adolf-hitler-ignora-dispositivos-constitucionais#_ednref2>. Acesso em: 01. jun. 2020.

FRANÇA, Diana Z. v. Google, Tribunal de Grande Instância de Paris, j. 15. fev. 2012, Disponível em: <http://www.legalis.net/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=3362>. Acesso em: 02. jun. 2020.

FRANÇA, Kriss Laure; Larry P., v. Google Inc, Tribunal de Grande Instância de Paris, 17ª Câmara, j. 15. fev. 2012.

FRANÇA, Martinez, v. Google, Tribunal de Grande Instânciade Paris, 17ª Câmara, j. 08. set. 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.legalis.net/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=2985>. Acesso em: 28. dez. 2019.

FRANÇA, SOS Racisme, v. Google, Tribunal de Grande Instância de Paris, 2011.

FRANÇA, Tiscali Acces e outros v. Free, Uejf e outros, Corte de Apelações de Paris. 14ª Câmara, j. 24. nov. 2006, Disponível em: <http://www.legalis.net/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=1793>. Acesso em: 28. abr. 2020.

GOOGLE SEARCH Statistics, Internet Live Stats, 2015, Disponível em: <http://www.internetlivestats.com/google-search-statistics/>, Acesso em: 03 dez. 2019.

GYÖNGYI, Zoltán; GARCIA-MOLINA, Hector, Web Spam Taxonomy, 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2005), 10 mai. 2005, New York, ACM Press. Disponível em: <http://airweb.cse.lehigh.edu/2005/gyongyi.pdf>. Acesso em: 20. jun. 2020.

HERN, Alex, Who runs Hollywood? Google has an answer, but it’s not a good one, 4, set, 2015, Carderno Google, The Guardian, United Kingdom, Disponível em: <http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/04/who-runs-hollywood-google-search-direct-answer-antisemitic>. Acesso em: 24. fev. 2020.

KARAPAPA, Savroula; BORGHI, Maurizio, Search engine liability for autocomplete suggestions: personality, privacy and the power of the algorithm, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2015, p. 1-29. Oxford University Press, 2015,

KERSHAW, Ian, Hitler, Tradução de Pedro Maia Soares, São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2010, p. 181.

LAIDLAW, Emily B, Regulating Speech in Cyberspace: Gatekeepers, Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721

MARCHERI, Pedro Lima; FURLANETO NETO, Mário, A Prática do Nazismo via Internet, In: GUARAGNI, Fábio André; CAMBI, Eduardo Augusto Salomão (Coord.), BARACAT, Eduardo Milléo; OLIVEIRA, Francisco Cardozo (Org.), Direito Penal: Diálogos (Im)pertinentes, Curitiba, Instituto Memória, 2014.

MONREAL, Eduardo Novoa, Fundamentos de los Delitos de Omisión. Buenos Aires: Depalma, 1984.

PALAIS des Nations, Observations Submitted to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination for the Thematic Discussion on “Racist Hate Speech”, Unione forense per la tutela dei diritti umani: Genebra, 2012, Disponível em: <http://www.unionedirittiumani.it/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Information-paper-on-racist-hate-speech-Italian-network-on-racial-discrimination.pdf>. Acesso em: 05. ago. 2020.

PERBOST, Fabrice, La Lutte Contre Les Propos Antisémites sur Internet, Revue de Jurisprudence Commerciale. Droit des Nouvelles Technologies, jul./out., 2014.

POLSKA, Proces o obrazę prezydenta przez internautę będzie trwał, Newsweek, Disponível em: <http://polska.newsweek.pl/proces-o-obraze-prezydenta-przez-internaute-bedzie-trwal,57221,1,1.html>. Acesso em: 08. jan. 2020.

SCHAUER, Frederick., Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.